Thursday, July 18, 2019

Radiation Therapy

1. What c erstwhilepts in the chapter ar illustrated in this boldness? What ethical takingss atomic number 18 raise by beam engineering science? staple fibre concepts that atomic number 18 covered in this case argon responsibility, accountability and liability. Ethical issues that are raised by irradiation technology is when scientist is finding ways to spend radiation therapy to destroy throw out(p)cerous cells while make sure that healthy cells are non creation harmed. An incident occurred where Mr. Jerome-Parks experienced deafness and sound-blindness, ulcers in his mouth and throat, persistent nausea, and unvoiced pain. (Laudon, 2012, p. 131). Organizations did not take the prison term to mightily train doctors and medical tote upup technicians on that pointfore incidents care Jerome-Parks happens. The mechanisms that are use to cure patients are not being appropriately updated and consume carefully. In this case study we can see that the technicians ar e not being fully prudent and being careless, and doctors that are not getting the full nurture for operating the railroad car. 2. What management, fundamental law and technology factors that was amenable for the enigmas detailed in this case?The management, organization and technology factors were responsible for the problems detailed in this case because they failed to provide extensive gentility for doctors, technicians, and motorcar operations as comfortably as insufficient staffs. They should have scene of creating a mandatory checklist for employees each magazine the form was being used. The want of fellowship on the machines, the lack of reportage these incidents for rising references instead the doctors and technicians do not troubleshoot the problem unless it is serious and by that time the patient(s) is already injured.The machines were not well designed, there was parcel product glitch and the complexity of new analogue accelerator technology has not been accompanied by with appropriate updates in parcel package (Laudon, 2012, p. 132). 3. Do you finger that both of the groups knobbed with this issue (hospital administrators, technicians, medical equipment, and packet shapers) should give the majority of the blame for these incidents? I feel as if they are all responsible for this issue because if the medical equipment, software manufacturer and technicians were the original spate who would be experiencing the machine.The software manufacturer designed the software so they should have known if there was any fault that was missed during the trial and error stage. If there was they shouldve continued with to a greater extent look into until the software was nearly perfect because it is what operated the consummate machine. The software was the main source of machine to operate because those software engineers were hired for a reason and they had responsibility in execution the errors and debugging them. This also would g o on to the medical equipment and technicians because these technicians should already have knowledge on what is right and what is incorrectly.Technicians are the one that tries out the machine at the hospital first they are the one that have the main knowledge on how these machines should be operating. wholly these three should be responsible for this issue since they are part in creating the machine and testing it out. 4. How would a cardinal reporting agency that gathered selective information on radiation-related accidents help reduce the number of radiation therapy errors in the incoming? Having a central reporting agency that gathered data of radiation-related accidents could prevent future overdoses, misadministration, and deaths or near deaths.These data can train future and presend doctors from doing these incidents, allows the agency to monitor the use of the machine and especially creates a sanctuary environment. If these accidents were to occur more than once than t he managers are the MIS could take in the machines for a more detailed examination, changing the policy and procedures. in any case reporting the radiation therapy errors can used to teach future doctors, technicians, medical operators virtually it so they would not make the aforesaid(prenominal) mistake again. At the same time this can save many lives that was once put into danger due to the lack of knowledge, carelessness, and laziness. . If you were in charge of designing electronic software for a linear accelerator, what are any(prenominal) features you would include? Are there any features you would avoid? If I were in charge of designing electronic software for a linear accelerator some features I would include a check list that is embedded within the machine ensuring that everything goes smoothly, a safety button which allows the machine to alert the doctor or technicians that something went wrong and volition automatically shut prevail over if the machine seems to malf unction that can do harm to a patient.Making sure that the software is doing its job in saving peoples lives, the software will go through multiple of examination until it is work at its potential. Every time the strategy seems to malfunction it will be sent back to the manufacturing for fixing. I would avoid what happened to those patients that died because of the manufacturers error. Anything that was at fault will be avoided and things will be through with(p) properly and precisely to ensure every part of the machine is working. Work Cited Laudon, Kenneth and Laudon, Jane. (2012). focusing Information Systems Managing the digital film (5th ed. ). Pearson learning Canada.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.