Comanche Territory Review Essay Example

Comanche Territory Review Paper Essay on Comanche Territory Comanche Territory in the jargon of the stringers (journalists to survey the events of direct, hot spots) is a no mans land, where there is a war. That area, which is quite specifically narrowed down to city or district where operators and reporters move on broken glass and they know that they are being watched by snipers. Above the heads and shells exploding shards of house-building meat rained from all sides. Comanche Territory the place where we ought rather to blame, and even for standing reportage meddle there not worth it. Comanche Territory this is the most critical, the most significant division between life and death. On Comanche Territory, as elsewhere, the death is palpable and it seems that her bony fingers hold you by the scruff of the neck like a kitten The territory of the Comanches. a book written by waves of memory and a place of glory Perez-Reverte less well-known Russian public as a military journalist. Skimp on the details of the Russian version of Wikipedia says: Arturo Perez-Reverte, since 1971, more than twenty years worked as a military reporter for the newspaper Pueblo and for television covered the armed conflicts that took place in Cyprus, Lebanon, Western Sahara, Libya. Mozambique, Angola, Yugoslavia and other countries territory, as the story of two journalists teaches. : Marquez operator and correspondent Barlesa, removing events of the war in the Balkans in the early 90s. Marquez that Barles gone through many wars, and not every veteran can boast so many hotspots where journalists visited. That Marquez that Barlesa war a kind of drug. Yes, they are distorted by the war but on the other and can not be. Yes, they are poisoned by war and the same can not be otherwise. I think both of them would fit perfectly Kaidanovsky monologue of Stalker, the one in which he says that without the Zone can not. This whole war one big war Barles about it not once repeat that over time, all fused together and everyone killed is similar to each other -. Is the likeness of Zone from the film Tarkovsky We will write a custom essay sample on Comanche Territory Review specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Comanche Territory Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Comanche Territory Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Marquez obsessed remove exploding bridge, and around bomb the bridge and turned the story. The explosion should occur at any moment, but so far this has not happened, Marquez and Barles remember what they had to go, what to see. The book has chernukha, but it does not look in the pages of shocking. She somehow objective or something. Close to the ideal of the journalist to show the naked truth, without any evaluation. There are pretentious, but not mean wrong, reasoning Marquez on the vile essence of all the wars that the engineer who invented clever bullet evening goes with his family to the movies, not even thinking about how his offspring tearing flesh (by the way, reminds vonnegutovskoe outrage, as the wife of the man who invented the atomic bomb (sugar), can teach children). Well, about politicians, analysts and interpreters sitting many miles from the front it will also be mentioned. Pour a bucket of bile Reverte and those who called at the rear for a day or two, and then writes trehsotstranichnye books about the war, believing that everyone understood. But those who for months climbs out of bullets with a heavy camera on his shoulder thats, well, damn, they did not understand. Interestingly, by t he way, that is not devoid of Reverte and self-irony: They preferred to spend money on election campaigns, recruit pyshnotelye beauties, order futurologists program to fund the transfer of the Who knows where or Code of Honor of the Perez- Reverte . I think he Reverte as a journalist thought that way about someone. By the way, in the book of many well-known journalistic names (well, maybe not all, but trust names loud for writing characters fraternity are present there). There is a book and an excellent fatalistic humor, without which, it seems no conceivable good humanist a book about the war: When Jorge together with the Mujahideen made his way through the outskirts of Kabul, near exploded Russian missile, and four dead Afghans wave thrown directly at him, but at the very Jorge was not a scratch, but it was necessary to bear in mind that Jorge was a correspondent for the Spanish office. Vatican Radio and, so as to notice, Efe agency reports Enrique Ibanez, puffing on his old pipe, which he gave Arafat in Beirut should not attach much importance fluke that took place with Jorge they provided his firm . In general, a great book. Read in flight. Reverte dedicated this book to three journalists, with whom he worked in his time. But in fact it is a dedication to all the stringers of the past, present and future. Beautiful work of showing these people, without unnecessary embellishment (although, frankly, fatal charm in their description is, but maybe its just my personal perception? Im honestly wanted to be a stringer). They are all neurotic, sick in the head, with a bunch of social and personal problems. And they all rush to war again, as if he could not get away with it. But what is important is the product shows military journalists are not geeks and those bastards what they love to vilify public opinion. After all, true or times have you heard someone cursing these freaks, picks up a better man with guts Turned? Indeed, pick a frame better. And why? Yes, because they are doing their job, and do it professionally. And it is right. They do not need to rush to the aid of (but do), because I wish to save one wants to save ev eryone and I understand in this case, his helplessness it is better to get their hands on. In addition, each of them, even if it is for long dollar came to the forefront, it is that good and for a good picture ready paid with his life. Or rather not that ready, but that that is the declared price. Dying is something no one is ready. But it is necessary. I have a book, as can be seen from the ranting, like. In some way, reminded, The Rum Diary Hunter S. Thompson. After all, both of these books about journalistic tribe, as the tribe eternal Jews, wandering, vagabond, without shelter. The final book in the open. The reader can dream up whether heroes sweep zone perebegt:. Again shell forty-nine seconds, not yet settled its last fragments as Barles put a hand on his shoulder Marquez well see he said Where is it there -? I do not know there Marquez laughed his raspy laugh of aged ratchet then they jumped up and ran down the road. But, unfortunately, for the paragraph before Barles says the modified phrase from the movie blade Runner, They waited for the next shot and forty-two seconds s Well, Ive lived a good life thought Barles How is it out there, I saw something that does not see you, burned the ships of the Orion, and hid the sun at bay Tannhà ¤user ..? When we get back, do not forget to change batteries in Sony and wash a pair of dirty shirts that are lying in a hotel. Barles Marquez looked at trying to guess what he is thinking before you get up and running under fire. In the original it reads: Ive seen things in that you people would not believe. Warships, burning up on the shoulder of Orion. I saw B bimz, glittering in the dark near Tannhà ¤user Gate. And all these moments will be lost, will dissolve in time, like tears with rain drops. Time to die and seen the final book -. It is time to die Marquez and Barlesu, they pulled my ticket, now their turn and theres nothing you can do about it (a bout the three reasons for which are killed journalists in war just as it is written in the book and the ticket . - the main and indisputable one) even if you, the reader, decide to have mercy and let Marquez and Barlesu survive, remember: Robert Kapp hit a mine, Musa Jalil executed in a Nazi camp Jose Couso Shot American tank, Paul Moran blown up by a suicide bomber and a lot of T.. ex who does not reloaded a new cassette tape, a memory card. And all of them, and the subject of this book.

Definition and History of Cathode Ray

Definition and History of Cathode Ray A cathode ray is a beam of electrons  in a vacuum tube traveling from the negatively charged electrode (cathode) at one end to the positively charged electrode (anode) at the other, across a voltage difference between the electrodes. They are also called electron beams. How Cathode Rays Works The electrode at the negative end is called a cathode. The electrode at the positive end is called an anode. Since electrons are repelled by the negative charge, the cathode is seen as the source of the cathode ray in the vacuum chamber. Electrons are attracted to the anode and travel in straight lines across the space between the two electrodes. Cathode rays are invisible but their effect is to excite atoms in the glass opposite of the cathode, by the anode. They travel at high speed when voltage is applied to the electrodes and some bypass the anode to strike the glass. This causes atoms in the glass to be raised to a higher energy level, producing a fluorescent glow. This fluorescence can be enhanced by applying fluorescent chemicals to the back wall of the tube. An object placed in the tube will cast a shadow, showing that the electrons stream in a straight line, a ray. Cathode rays can be deflected by an electric field, which is evidence of it being composed of electron particles rather than photons. The rays of electrons can also pass through thin metal foil. However, cathode rays also exhibit wave-like characteristics in crystal lattice experiments. A wire between the anode and the cathode can return the electrons to the cathode, completing an electrical circuit. Cathode ray tubes were the basis for radio and television broadcasting. Television sets and computer monitors before the debut of plasma, LCD, and OLED screens were cathode ray tubes (CRTs). History of Cathode Rays With the 1650 invention of the vacuum pump, scientists were able to study the effects of different material in vacuums, and soon they were studying  electricity  in a vacuum. It was recorded as early as 1705 that in vacuums (or near vacuums) electrical discharges could travel a larger distance. Such phenomena became popular as novelties, and even reputable physicists such as Michael Faraday studied the effects of them. Johann Hittorf discovered cathode rays in 1869 using a Crookes tube and noting  shadows cast on the glowing wall of the tube opposite of the cathode. In 1897 J. J. Thomson discovered that the mass of the particles in cathode rays was 1800 times lighter than hydrogen, the lightest element. This was the first discovery of subatomic particles, which came to be called electrons. He received the 1906 Nobel Prize in Physics for this work. In the late 1800s, physicist Phillip von Lenard studied the cathode rays intently and his work with them earned him the 1905 Nobel Prize in Physics. The most popular commercial application of cathode ray technology is in the form of traditional television sets and computer monitors, although these are being supplanted by newer displays such as OLED.